<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WLAN 802.11n</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rficdesign.com/%20%20WLAN%20802.11n/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rficdesign.com/wlan-802-11n</link>
	<description>RF IC Electronics Wireless technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:19:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mimo specialist</title>
		<link>http://www.rficdesign.com/wlan-802-11n/comment-page-1#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>mimo specialist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rficdesign.com/rf/?p=423#comment-481</guid>
		<description>It will allow the standards bodies to start bickering about what should be in 802.11m. At some point, a vendor will make an implementation which meets 80% of the goals of 802.11m, and the standards community will spend the next two to four years polishing the document to reflect the industry implementation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will allow the standards bodies to start bickering about what should be in 802.11m. At some point, a vendor will make an implementation which meets 80% of the goals of 802.11m, and the standards community will spend the next two to four years polishing the document to reflect the industry implementation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
